BUREAUCRATIC REFORM OF KPKNL MALANG: IT’S EFFECT ON PERFORMANCE AND SERVICE QUALITY
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brocke, J. vom, Weber, M., Baumgartner, C., Roettcher, A., & Segerlund, S. (2022). Where to Allocate Business Process Management (BPM) in an Organization? Developing the BPM Governance Matrix at Endress+Hauser. Industry Forum at the 20th International Business Process Management Conference (BPM 2022), Germany.
Chien, N. B., & Thanh, N. N. (2022). The Impact of Good Governance on the People’s Satisfaction with Public Administrative Services in Vietnam. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010035
Dwiyanto, A. 2021. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. UGM Press. Yogyakarta.
Hartanto, D., Dalle, J., Akrim, A., & Anisah, H. U. 2021. “Perceived effectiveness of e-governance as an underlying mechanism between good governance and public trust: a case of Indonesia. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(6), 598–616.
Išoraitė, M. (2008). THE BALANCED SCORECARD METHOD: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE. Intelectual Economics, 1(3), 18–28.
Jauhari, A., Abd. Majid, M. S., Basri, H., & Abd. Jalil. 2020. “Are E-Government and Bureaucratic Reform Promoting Good Governance towards a Better Performance of Public Organization? General Management, 21(175). 25-30.
Kamal Mohd, Mohd Khirul Azwan and Romle, Abd Rahim and Yusof, Muhammad Suhaimi. 2015. “Good Governance and Organization Performance in Public Sector: A Proposed Framework. International Journal of Administration and Governance. 1(4). 63-68.
Kaplan, R. S. (2009). Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. In Handbooks of Management Accounting Research (Vol. 3, pp. 1253–1269). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(07)03003-9
KPKNL Malang. (2021). Pembangunan ZI WBK KPKNL Malang Tahun 2021. ZI-WBK 2021.
Kurniawati, N., Lubis, A. R., Darsono, N., & Chan, S. (2019). Do Good Governance and Service Quality Mediate the Effect of Bureaucratic Reform on Performance of the Archival Institutions in Indonesia? Quality Management, 20(169).
Keputusan Menteri Keuangan RI NO.36/KMK.01, 36 KMK.01 (2014). https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/tk/id/peraturan/peraturan-tk/94-keputusan-menteri-keuangan-republik-indonesia-nomor-36-kmk-01-2014.html
Presiden Regulation RI Number 81 about Grand Design Bureaucratuc Reform 2010-2025, Pub. L. No. 81 (2010). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/41084/perpres-no-81-tahun-
Pribadi, U. (2021). BUREAUCRATIC REFORM, PUBLIC SERVICE PERFORMANCE, AND CITIZENS’ SATISFACTION: THE CASE OF YOGYAKARTA, INDONESIA. Public Policy and Administration, 20(2), 312–326.
Transparency International Indonesia. (2022). CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX. Riset.Ti.or.Id. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2022
Wardana, Data., Meiwanda, Geovani. 2017. “Reformasi Birokrasi Menuju Indonesia Baru, Bersih dan Bermartabat. Wedana : Jurnal Pemerintahan, Politik dan Birokrasi. 3(1). 331-336.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.