EVALUATING RESEARCH COLLABORATION IN X INSTITUTION

Bayu Indra Pratama, Muhammad Shobaruddin
  Erudio, Vol 9, No 2 (2022),  pp. 184-210  
DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8081369
Abstract | References | Current | PDF Full Text
Viewed : 342 times

Abstract

Many studies have examined research collaboration related to research productivity and scientific publications. The tendency is that the higher the collaboration level, the higher the productivity. However, these studies do not always explain how the existing collaborations are formed. Even though lecturers in Indonesia have three responsibilities (Tridarma), which include education, research, and community service, these studies are also limited to the research aspect. The other two aspects are considered closely related because community service is considered as a downstream of research. Although qualitative studies can help explain the formation of research collaborations and community service, research on collaborations tends to use bibliometrics or social network analysis. This study seeks to explain the mapping and the formation of research collaborations at the X Institution, from 2020 to 2021, using bibliometric analysis combined with in-depth interviews with various stakeholders. Those years have been the initial period of using Research and Service Information Systems at the faculty level, so the availability of the data helps to describe the collaboration of research and community service at the X Institution. This mapping can be the basis for research and community service policies at the the X Institution.

Keywords


Research collaboration, co-authorship, bibliometrics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abramo, G., D’Angelo, A. C., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1016–1030.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: is there a correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171.

Arfina, A., & Khotimah, H. (2018). Visualisasi Co-Authorship Peneliti IPB Menggunakan Metode Chi. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Agri-Informatika, 5(1), 31–39.

Bansal, S., Mahendiratta, S., Kumar, S., Sarma, P., Prakash, A., & Medhi, B. (2019). Collaborative research in the modern era: Need and challenges. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 51(3), 137–139. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31391680

Barik, N., & Jena, P. (2018). Authorship distribution and collaboration in LIS open access journals: a Scopus based analysis during 2001 to 2015. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1024.

Bukvova, H. (2010). Studying Research Collaboration: A Literature Review. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10.

Elisabeth, D., Rokhman, M. F., Harahap, N. C., Al Hakim, S., & Sensuse, D. I. (2019). Discovering Scientific Collaboration Activities using Social Network Analysis. A Case Study: Faculty of Computer Science Universitas Indonesia. Paper Presented at the 2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE).

Fatmawati, E. (2012). Pengantar kajian bibliometrika dalam perspektif pustakawan. Libraria: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 2(1), 1–17.

Franco, M., & Pinho, C. (2019). A case study about cooperation between University Research Centres: Knowledge transfer perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(1), 62–69.

Freshwater, D., Sherwood, G., & Drury, V. (2006). International research collaboration: Issues, benefits, and challenges of the global network. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(4), 295–303.

Gingras, Y. (2016). Bibliometrics and research evaluation: Uses and abuse. Mit Press: MIT Press.

Giuri, P., Munari, F., Scandura, A., & Toschi, L. (2019). The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 261–278.

Junandi, S. (2015). Analisis Sitiran Karya Ilmiah Pustalawan Indonesia Pada Jurnal Visi Pustaka Tahun 2008-2013. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, Xl(1).

Kastrin, A., Klisara, J., Lužar, B., & Povh, J. (2018). Is science driven by principal investigators? Scientometrics, 117(2), 1157–1182.

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

Kumar, S. (2015). Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management.

Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

Lievrouw, L. A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: Bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research, 16(5), 615–628.

Lu, W., Ren, Y., Huang, Y., Bu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Scientific collaboration and career stages: An ego-centric perspective. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101207

Mark, T. (2007). National and international library collaboration: Necessity, advantages. Liber Quarterly, 17(3/4).

Maryono, M., & Surajiman, S. (2017). Kolaborasi Internal, Domestik dan Internasional Serta Korelasinya dengan Sitasi yang Diperoleh: Analisis Publikasi UGM di Scopus. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 13(21), 166–177.

Natakusumah, E. K. (2014). Penentuan kolaborasi penelitian dan distribusi pengarang pada jurnal teknologi indonesia (The determinations of research collaboration and authors distribution in the Jurnal Teknologi Indonesia). Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 35(1), 15–24.

Natakusumah, E. K. (2016). Bibliometric Analysis of the Inkom Journal (Analisis Bibliometrik Jurnal Inkom). Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 36(1), 1–10.

Nelisa, M. (2012). Produktivitas pengarang artikel bidang ilmu perpustakaan dan informasi di Indonesia tahun 1978-2007: Analisis bibliometrika menggunakan hukum Lotka. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 30(2), 73–95.

Prieto-Gutiérrez, J. J., & Segado-Boj, F. (2019). Annals of Library and Information Studies: A bibliometric analysis of the journal and a comparison with the top library and information studies journals in Asia and worldwide (2011–2017). The Serials Librarian, 77(1–2), 38–48.

Rahmaida, R., Saefuddin, A., & Sartono, B. (2019). Predicting Potential Co-Authorship Using Random Forest: Case of Scientific Publications in Indonesian Institute of Sciences. STI Policy and Management Journal, 4(2).

Srivastava, D., Sonker, S. K., & Singh, R. (2021). A Bibliometric assessment of India’s Library and information science Research publications during 2011-2020. Library Philosophy and Practice.

Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33–38.

Sulistyo-Basuki. (2016). Dari Bibliometrika Hingga Informetrika. Media Pustakawan, 23(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37014/medpus.v23i1.836

Tupan, T., Rahayu, R. N., Rachmawati, R., & Rahayu, E. S. R. (2018). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bidang Ilmu Instrumentasi. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 39(2), 135–149.

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.7. Univeristeit Leiden, February, 51. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.8.pdf

Ye, Y., De Moortel, K., & Crispeels, T. (2020). Network dynamics of Chinese university knowledge transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(4), 1228–1254.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8081369

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.